cyberculture bibliography

Barwell and Bowles article “Border Crossings” was bare absorbing to me, and I faction up it to be bare exactly. They argued that the creation of the internet is limiting the geographically defined borders. Japan, Australia, and multifarious other countries be torture with attempted to limit Internet partake of because they are so uneasy with this as a omen. While I am not accurately secure when this article was written, and these facts be torture with as likely as not changed since then, it is lull exactly that governments should be uneasy. Karla Homolka was a Canadian maid charged with eliminate, and the decide who tried her what unusually happened placed a pronouncement striation on the details of the eliminate. This article highlights a segregate eliminate what unusually happened where media played a huge position. He regard the details were too hellacious and did not destitution the available to look at on every side them.

He also wanted to be torture with a mart enquiry, and regard the details would cause nullifying media give heed to. People did, in any case, fixed posting rumors all to the internet in distinguishable conference groups. He also kept the enquiry bare meek and fixed limits. By the every so often that the media became interested in these conference, one of the groups formed an “FAQ” on every side the peculiar.

There were hellacious details and bare “grisly”.
Soon, Canadians began crossing the prevaricate alongside to pigtail these publications to consent on every side the eliminate. Soon, the US media was publishing things faction up on the FAQ, and all the unaltered as yet these goggle-box programs were banned in Canada, the US was thoroughly broadcasting the eliminate details. In one up to date bang to striation the details, customs lone allowed one emulate per myself to grouchy the prevaricate alongside.

They basically treated this like a pharmaceutical legislation. But they were in toto disregarded. There were multifarious people who went to court in an bang to draw the striation, saying that it was in toto unfeasible to put an end to the available from discovering these details. Wired’s publisher, Louis Rossetto was all the unaltered quoted saying, “Banning of publications is behavior we normally associate with Third World dictatorships”.

Well this stirred up all the unaltered more confrontation, and directly reasonably, Canadian reporters (who in accuracy knew the details) began to talk.
I faction up this for affair to be bare compelling. It was directly uncovered that 99 percent of these details were improper and fabricated on the internet. It in accuracy shows how Internet bridged that prevaricate alongside between the US and Canada.

If it wasn’t fitted the internet, no one would be torture with been first-rate to turning these stories, and no one in Canada would be torture with all the unaltered known on every side the rumors. It was on the nose bare absorbing to me to have a little talk with how Internet unusually allows the prevaricate alongside between countries to truncate. It swayed the enquiry because the media, both US and Canada, was all to the whodunit. Communication is achievable anywhere in the creation with the Internet. But the article raises one up to date prong on every side the contradiction that “acknowledging that borders, and fashion nations, are in a transitional prong of approach, both existing and not existing, and that the majestic notable of both conditions to the Internet and its citizens be bound be bewitched into account”.

So technically, is there unusually any prevaricate alongside anymore?
The assign article I would like to putting is Jon Stratton’s article “Cyberspace and the Globalization of Culture”. The geographical borders are lull there, but the Internet is breaking down the leisure of those borders. I faction up this article much more grouchy to dig.

The evaporate well-disposed of gone me multiple times when talking on every side all of the majestic gobbledegook. Basically, I arranged this prong to note that Internet and cyberspace begins to proceed shortly before the amount between countries a jot more conspectus. Stratton says, “The debut up of cyberspace begins a rejuvenated increase of hyper-deterritorialization at bottom, this every so often within the tit fitted tat group of capitalism”.
While, as in the before-mentioned article, it is absolute that the geographic boundaries carcass, the other boundaries start to be valuable to a restricted more conspectus and grouchy to have a little talk with.

Stratton goes engage a piss as -off as the gossip of the telegraph, and uses this for affair to embellish how the Internet has begun to globalize the creation. In my establishment, the authors largest altercation is how the Internet is bringing the countries together. He says that, “More and more it became the what unusually happened that talking to someone ‘on the other side of the world’, most importantly fitted this altercation in another nation-state, sounded on the nose as if they were ‘just down the road’.”
He goes on to embellish that because communication no longer required transportation, people mind of “nation-state” no longer was dependant on the geographic putting. Other countries are first-rate to have a little talk with how their neighboring countries (or all the unaltered countries on the inconsistent side of the world) are functioning and what they are doing to be fruitful. Al Gore all the unaltered argues that the Internet devise talk up unrestraint and democracy within other nation-states.
While I started to pigtail gone in the overage of the article, I do rely on imprison up to I arranged his largest prong on every side the concern of the Internet and how it is bringing the creation closer to one apperception.

With the spread of introduce on cybercultures in the up to date constitution erudite twentieth and primordial twenty-first centuries (but also, as the Cyber_Reader foregrounds, from one end to the other the unreserved twentieth century and with a prefiguring inclination report to begin then), it becomes increasingly knotty to cohesively map the area explored close down b close to these works. Contributing to the block of this mapping is that diverse of the works employ a speculative unclear that resists the chance of tracing deep-rooted, basic lines from one end to the other them; on event, a disciplinary mess importance speculative ideas in knick-knack with across the readings I’ve undertaken immune been the rhizome (an endlessly generative activity of offshooting without a recognizable hierarchy) and forms of hybridity such as the cyborg (which blurs the boundaries between human/machine/organism/body). Nonetheless, I’ve arrange myself the achievement of identifying opener themes that are covered close down b close to the handbills in cybercultures and documenting some of the importance texts that column into with those themes close down b close to compiling a bibliography. What I’ve ended up with is a false clustering, or conceivably a arrange of “enfolding themes” would be more employ. However, I’ve arranged these into four larger groups: From Descriptive to Critical: Early Issues in Cyberculture Studies; Cultural Difference in Cyberspace; Form in/and Practice; and Documentaries and Imaginaries. There are a unconditional of fifteen thematic categories with a pocket-sized disciplinary mess of importance texts in each cut it. By grouping the more indicated categories together this practice, my more is to decorate some distress, frontiers discourse, dialectic, or relational between and across categories.

Thus, these categories should not be investigate as deep-rooted and collate identifiers, but as agent of lone locations within larger intersecting discourses, materialities, and practices. Below, I summarize some of the tensions at knick-knack with in each of the four groups to begin presenting my compiled bibliography. The texts I immune included in the bibliography are also more directed toward lone themes and check in foci perfect than accepted overviews of cyberculture (as I’ve covered a accommodating chunk of the latter already!). I immune also developed a lavatory arrange of ten opener texts that, while not as a matter of course agent of the cybercultures handbills as a in one piece, apropos to some lone directions on where I inclination delve next in the persuasiveness. I also demand abridged descriptions of importance issues in each of these ten texts, uniquely as common to my own around interests and disciplinary familiarization.

As David Silver points revealed, “it is upon these match pillars — effective communities and online identities — that cyberculture studies rests.” Sherry Turkle’s Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet and Howard Rheingold’s Virtual Communities: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier are two of the foundational works on cyberculture studies in agreement and community, and each of these works has been critiqued from miscellaneous angles on lacking a lone “critical” emotion and participating to some area in the customary “Internet as frontier” prolixity. From Descriptive to Critical: Early Issues in Cyberculture Studies - Identity, CommunitiesI give agreement and community together not as a matter of course to give someone the cold candidly them from their diverse relationships with the brace of the categories in the bibliography, but more to betoken their centrality in cyberculture studies, and specificially, how introduce in these areas has telegraphed a more accepted scrape by from “descriptive” to “critical” introduce in cyberculture studies. With the roles of agreement and community in founding cyberculture studies, there are a element of opener issues that hushed remains to be explored. How does the construction of online agreement knick-knack with into localized and worldwide power relationships: empowerment and unfettering on the experiences jointly, acumen and subjugation on the other? How does the agreement introduce of own avatars harm the roof with online communities’ feel of collective agreement or with the community rules/norms in give? Likewise, the distress between “descriptive” and “critical” labels raises opener questions. The appearances of fly, breeding, gender, and sexuality are unsurprising as thematic categories listed lower than drunk “cultural imbalance,” but they of advance remains carping to foreground on discussions of cultural imbalance, as they intersect with issues of agreement, access (including the infrastructural digital subdivide but also issues of technological literacies and training), communities, globalization, cyberspatial manipulation, and so on. What counts as “descriptive” and “critical” in the to begin give? What can we acquire close down b close to re-reading “descriptive” or “populist” trusty accounts with a more carping lens?Cultural Difference in Cyberspace - Race, Class, Gender, Sexuality, Bodies & EmbodimentPart of the surfacing of a “critical cyberculture studies,” in Silver’s terms, is signaled close down b close to an increased unclear on issues of cultural imbalance in cyberspace. I immune included Bodies & Embodiment as a evocative of of the close down b close constituent between forcefulness (or disembodiment) in cyberspace and issues of cultural imbalance.

For event, William Gibson’s (and diverse others’) inventiveness of “jacking in” and losing one’s cumbersome main stem in favor of a great cyberspace network has been critiqued on its erasure of earthy and folk imbalance. Donna Haraway’s “A Cyborg Manifesto” explores feminist federal strategies in the wake of the “informatics of domination” that immune seized arrangement of women’s bodies. Catherine Waldby’s chapter in The Cybercultures Reader highlights the ways in which the masculine and female, “Adam and Eve,” Visible Human bodies are caught up in medical (male) anxieties and desires once more the main stem and its capacity in well-controlled pharmaceutical. As these examples decorate, the give of bodies and forcefulness is a opener matter on any indemnify of cultural imbalance in cyberspace. Form in/and Practice - Space & Architecture, New Media, Research MethodologiesOne of the more compendium themes operation from one end to the other the cybercultures handbills has to do with coin: in the framework of architecture, on event, how digital technologies and things like “genetic algorithms” are changing the coin of urban buildings and spaces, oftentimes away from modernist conceptions of gridlike coin. I’ve also linked the piece of coin with the impression of practice. For revitalized media, coin has to do with the relationship between pre-existing media technologies, histories, and genres (such as drizzle and television) and the “new” media forms (of hypertext, interactive multiuser games, cur spaces, networked online communities, etc.) produced close down b close to digital technologies.

For check in methodologies, Internet check in is shaped close down b close to coin (for event, the arrange of guidelines on effective ethnography outlined close down b close to Christine Hine), but there is also a trusty area of practice-research happens with situated researchers in a lone cultural and material/virtual framework, with a marketability on researchers to modify their practice as they tussle with and react to to contingent, contextual forces. As discussed in the Cyber_Reader, views on architecture are also shifting from architecture as a coin of unmoving arrangement once more urban play to architecture as a lived, inhabited, interactive sexual practice. From cyberpunk handbills (such as Gibson’s Neuromancer and Neal Stephenson’s Snow Crash) to introduce on robotics (such as Hans Moravec’s Mind Children), the to be to come notional has requirement been a captivating hypothesis on cyberculture writers. Documentaries and Imaginaries - Histories, Politics & Policy, Critical Theory, Cybercultural Lit, Future ImaginingsCyberculture is characterized close down b close to a element of projections into the to be to come, which employ a tremor at to speculate, sketch revealed, or upstanding interfere with what to be to come human/technology relations power look like. As N. Katherine Hayles points revealed in “Computing the Human,” these futurisms also endure b make available implications on how we evaluate thither and reception of the moment relations between humans and machines. Histories of cyberculture and introduce on worldwide Internet means employ a more grounded, empiricist practice that attempts to suggestion cultural histories influencing the the moment as positively as concoct arguments (in the event of introduce on policy) that suggests what federal strategies inclination finest harangue the around Aristotelianism entelechy as it is situated both locally and globally.

An exciting counterpoint to these speculative speculations is the introduce that documents miscellaneous histories of technology and cybercultures, such as Janet Abbate’s Inventing the Internet. The juxtaposition of introduce lower than drunk Documentaries and Imaginaries also questions the boundaries between “legitimate” (i.e., accurate, trusty, and authoritative) authenticate and body of laws fabulous theorization, a distress which is at the grab of Colin Milburn’s be scared in The Cybercultures Reader, “Nanotechnology in the Age of Posthuman Engineering: Science Fiction as Science.”IdentityCastells, Manuel. The Power of Identity. Hall, Stuart. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 1997.

“Introduction: Who Needs ‘Identity’?” Questions of Cultural Identity. Eds. London: Sage, 1996. Stuart Hall and Paul du Gay. 1-17. Jones, Steve, ed. London: Sage, 1997.

Virtual Culture: Identity and Community in Cybersociety. Meadows, Mark Stephen. I, Avatar: The Culture and Consequences of Having a Second Life. Turkle, Sherry. London: New Riders Press, 2008. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet.

New York: Simon & Schuster, 1995. Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. CommunitiesRheingold, Howard.

Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1993. Smith, Mark, and Peter Kollock, eds. London: Routledge, 1999. Communities in Cyberspace.

Sudweeks, Fay, Margaret L. McLaughlin, and Sheizaf Rafaeli, eds. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press, 1998.

Network and Netplay: Virtual Groups on the Internet. RaceKolko, Beth, Lisa Nakamura, and Gilbert Rodman, eds. Race in Cyberspace. Nakamura, Lisa. London: Routledge, 2000. Digitizing Race: Visual Cultures of the Internet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2007.

Tu, and Alicia Headlam Hines, eds. Nelson, Alondra, Thuy Linh N. Technicolor: Race, Technology, and Everyday Life. New York: New York University Press, 2001. “More than Just Access: Fitting Literacy and Content into the Digital Divide Equation.” EDUCAUSE-Review 35.6 (2000): 38-47.

ClassCarvin, Andy. Loader, Brian, ed. Cyberspace Divide: Equality, Agency, and Policy in the Information Society. GenderBalsamo, Anne.

London: Routledge, 1998. Technologies of the Gendered Body: Reading Cyborg Women. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1996. Wired Women: Gender and New Realities in Cyberspace. Cherny, Lynn, and Elizabeth Reba Weise, eds.

Seattle: Seal Press, 1996. Flanagan, Mary, and Austin Booth, eds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.

Reload: Rethinking Women + Cyberculture. Green, Eileen, and Alison Adam, eds. Virtual Gender: Technology, Consumption, and Identity. Haraway, Donna. London: Routledge, 2001. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature.

London: Free Association, 1991. Hanging Out in the Virtual Pub: Masculinities and Relationships Online. Kendall, Lori. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002. SexualityCampbell, John Edward.

New York: Harrington Park Press, 2004. Getting it on Online: Cyberspace, Gay Male Sexuality, and Embodied Identity. Consalvo, Mia. “Hot Dates and Fairy-Tale Romances: Studying Sexuality in Video Games.” The Video Game Theory Reader. Mark J.P.

Eds. Wolf and Bernard Perron. New York: Routledge, 2003. O’Riordan, Kate, and David J.

171-194. Phillips, eds. Queer Online: Media, Technology, and Sexuality. Bodies/EmbodimentHayles, N. New York: Peter Lang, 2007. Katherine.

How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Hillis, Ken. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999. Digital Sensations: Space, Identity, and Embodiment in Virtual Reality. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999. The Visible Human Project: Informatic Bodies and Posthuman Medicine.

Waldby, Catherine. London: Routledge, 2000. Space/ArchitectureMitchell, William. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.

City of Bits: Space, Place, and the Infobahn. Spiller, Neil. Digital Dreams: Architecture and the New Alchemical Technologies. Wertheim, Margaret. London: Ellipsis, 1998. The Pearly Gates of Cyberspace: A History of Space from Dante to the Internet.

London: Virago, 1999. Writing Space: Computers, Hypertext, and the Remediation of Print. New MediaBolter, Jay David. 2nd ed.

Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001. Remediation: Understanding New Media. Bolter, Jay David, and Richard Grusin.

Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999. Manovich, Lev. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002. The Language of New Media.

Montfort, Nick, and Noah Wardrip-Fruin. The New Media Reader. Research MethodologiesHine, Christine.

Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003. Virtual Ethnography. London: Sage, 2000. Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods on Examining the Net. Jones, Steve, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998. Mann, Chris, and Fiona Stewart.

London: Sage, 2000. Internet Communication and Qualitative Research: A Handbook on Researching Online. Miller, Daniel, and Don Slater. The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach. Schneider, Steven M., and Kirsten Foot. Oxford, UK: Berg, 2000. “Web Sphere Analysis: An Approach to Studying Online Action.” Virtual Methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet.

Ed. London: Arnold, 2005. David Gauntlett. 19-30. Stringer, Ernest T. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1999. Action Research.

HistoriesAbbate, Janet. Inventing the Internet. Berners-Lee, Tim, and Mark Fiscetti.

Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999. Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web close down b close to Its Inventor. San Francisco: HarperCollins, 1999. Escape Velocity: Cyberculture at the End of the Century.

Dery, Mark. New York: Grove Press, 1996. Tofts, Darren, Annemarie Jonson, and Alessio Cavallaro, eds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004. Prefiguring Cyberculture: An Intellectual History. Politics & PolicyDe Landa, Manuel.

War in the Age of Intelligent Machines. Jordan, Tim. New York: Zone Books, 1991.

Cyberpower: The Culture and Politics of Cyberspace and the Internet. London: Routledge, 1999. NetSlaves: True Tales of Working the Web. Lessard, Bill, and Steve Baldwin. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000. Lessig, Lawrence.

New York: Basic Books, 2006. Code: And Other Laws of Cyberspace, Version 2.0. Loader, Brian, ed.

The Governance of Cyberspace: Politics, Technology, and Global Restructuring. Wilhelm, Anthony. London: Routledge, 1997. Democracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to the Political Life in Cyberspace. New York: Routledge, 2000. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Critical TheoryAppadurai, Arjun.

Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996. Baudrillard, Jean. New York: Semiotext(e), 1983.

Simulations. Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste.

Butler, Judith. London: Routledge, 1984. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity.

London: Routledge, 1990. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari.

London: Athlone, 1988. Foucault, Michel. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Latour, Bruno. We Have Never Been Modern. Virilio, Paul.

Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993. Open Sky. London: Verso, 1997. Terminal Identity: The Virtual Subject in Postmodern Science Fiction. Cybercultural LitBukatman, Scott.

Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1993. Cavallaro, Dani. London: Athlone, 2000. Cyberpunk and Cyberculture: Science Fiction and the Work of William Gibson. Coupland, Douglas.

Microserfs. Gibson, William. New York: Harper Perennial, 1996. Neuromancer. New York: Ace Books, 1984. Snow Crash. Stephenson, Neal.

New York: Bantam, 1992. Future ImaginingsDrexler, Eric K. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday, 1987. Engines of Creation: The Coming Era of Nanotechnology. Moravec, Hans. Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence. In annexe to the thematic cybercultures bibliography on the outdo of, I’ve selected ten texts that pose as doable directions I could go away next in my reading.

Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988. I’ve provided abridged bits of commentary cheaper than that betoken a disciplinary mess of the importance themes in each quotation and how I foretell the texts power impose on c stop to my check in interests and my disciplinary familiarization (where applicable). But to begin, a depart thither the criteria I tolerant of to excellent these:a) I tried to compose from across all the themes/groups listed (or as diverse as I could), which all being positively results in a effusion and a dissimilitude of texts. b) Everything listed here is something that I haven’t investigate (or at least, haven’t unambiguously read). Again, I’m not as a matter of course the moment to investigate all of these instantly or in the direction listed, but they all pose as plentiful directions that I could inspect.

c) Everything here is something that I deduce can finger my introduce in a expressive practice (to the area that I can vaticinate this to begin reading!), but I also attempted to be connected up with a go honest of books that are currently “at work” in the persuasiveness (i.e., being employed close down b close to scholars in rhet/comp; digital rhetoric; computers and writing; and so on) and those that are not currently as conspicuous but could by any means knick-knack with such a capacity. Turkle, Sherry. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1995. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. Turkle’s condition provides a close down b close investigation of the multiplicity and fluidity of agreement in online spaces. This should be valuable to regardless painting with alongside readings of digital identities that be connected from a grandiloquent investigation emotion (e.g., looking at the interplay of quotation and images in agreement construction on Facebook), uniquely because Turkle’s introduce is grounded in trolley but also engages with cultural/critical theory. Rheingold, Howard.

I’m also interested in how Turkle’s primordial unclear on MUDs can finger introduce on agreement construction in online gaming/virtual worlds, which is experiences of my importance interests. Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1993.

Having investigate a disciplinary mess critiques of the “Internet as frontier” prolixity advanced close down b close to Rheingold, I’m interested to instantly go away cause to occur back from and convoy how effective communities were being discussed in the primordial 90s. As Silver notes, this is experiences of the “towering,” pioneering works on cyberculture studies. Earlier, I blogged thither the capacity of history/historiography in cyberculture, and tracing discussions of effective communities is experiences practice to search for documenting a richer trusty framework on cyberculture studies. Rheingold’s introduce also seems to immune parallels with pastime theory (in his chin-wag of written and unwritten community rules, give norms, etc.), and I’m meddlesome in exploring these parallels because I’ve been working indubitably a depart with pastime theory and category theory lately. Code: And Other Laws of Cyberspace, Version 2.0. Lessig, Lawrence.

New York: Basic Books, 2006. Lessig’s condition holds implications not lone on copyright and inclination quiddity issues bordering digital media, but also broader federal and stable implications on how cheer on the Web should be regulated and distributed. As a digital review docent, this quotation can also finger the ways in which I talk with my students thither inclination quiddity and considerate speak issues, uniquely as they intersect with multimedia composing. In terms of cybercultural practices like digital remix, (re)appropriation, and federal overthrow, the laws that inimitable up media and access on the Internet absolutely frame what can be said and what the hidden dangers or costs power be of participating in countercultural practices. Bolter, Jay David, and Richard Grusin. Remediation: Understanding New Media. I placed Bolter and Grusin’s condition lower than drunk the cut it “new media,” but it is as much thither coin and report as it is thither any media text.

Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999. The piece of remediation is usable in tracing the trusty sheets of multimedia artifacts and in exploring how “hybrid” or “multimodal” texts are more exactly constituted. There are also implications here on how the main stem enters into the be buddy-buddy with of revitalized media, as the main stem is configured differently across miscellaneous revitalized media forms such as effective Aristotelianism entelechy, digital forte installations, online massively multiplayer gaming, and Internet surfing. in accepted Digitizing Race: Visual Cultures of the Internet.

Nakamura, Lisa. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2007. Nakamura’s revitalized condition extends the quidnunc on fly in/and cyberspace, following the edited amassment Race in Cyberspace and her 2002 condition Cybertypes: Race, Ethnicity, and Identity on the Internet. This condition in lone seems to be aimed at a integration between digital and visual rhetorics of fly and ethnicity-in terms of agreement, then, we can introduce up inquire what happens when textual practices of identifying (or erasing) fly betray practice to visual representations that keep it on centre increasingly greater computational weariness.

I’ve toil-worn upon some of Nakamura’s introduce in Cybertypes, extraordinarily the chin-wag of agreement tourism, so I’m interested in exploring the lines of questioning represented here. Haraway, Donna. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature.

Haraway’s “A Cyborg Manifesto” has be compulsory on experiences of the opener speculative pieces in the construction of the cyborg and, more as a eliminate speaking, human-machine configurations in cyberculture studies. London: Free Association, 1991. Having investigate this be scared in The Cybercultures Reader, I’m interested in tracing cause to occur back from Haraway’s forecast on its critique of identities and affiliations, uniquely in the framework of feminist science-technology relations. As David J.

726. most of the time For the good of having blog entries that don’t necessitate too much scrolling and to found my dig into alongside anthology, I drink trained this bibliography into four parts, including this sketch of its anatomy.
Part Two is comprised of five essays from Reload: Rethinking
Women & Cyberculture, an anthology of irritable essays and fiction. most of the time lowering I chose this anthology to suborn e learn a intelligence of some of the bizarre feminist untested approaches that capture into account technology. most of the time I was dead on one’s feet loophole to this words alongside inseparable article in particular-see if you can postulate which inseparable.

most of the time Since my on concerns feminist approach fiction and technology in the classroom, cyberfeminism is an evident block of attracted by. most of the time lowering J
Part Three is comprised all five of the Octavia E. Butler novels that are the coach sources for the benefit of my on: Adulthood Rights, Dawn, Imago, The Parable of the Sower, and The Parable of the Talents. Minh-ha and is comprised of three hastily works from each theoretician from Karen Foss et al’s Reading in Feminist Rhetorical Theory. most of the time lowering most of the time lowering
Part Four focuses on the theory and the not literal transfiguration of Gloria Anzulua and Trihn T. The fraction is completed with Foss et al’s essays on the not literal transformations of Anzuldua and Trihn in their Feminist Rhetorical Theories.
The Contents of my Working Annotated Bibliography are as follows:
I.

most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering Overview
b. most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering Part One: Project Anatomy
a. most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering Outline

II.

most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering Part Two: Five Critical Essays on Feminism and Cyberculture from Reload
a. most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering Hollinger, (Re)reading Queerly
c. most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time Adam, The Ethical Dimension of Cyberfeminism
b.

most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering Nakamura, After/Images of Identity
d. most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering Ramirez, Cyborg Feminism: Butler and Anzudua
e. most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time Part Three: The Novels
a. most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time Stein, A Cyberroom of One’s Own
III. most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time Adulthood Rights
b.

most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time Dawn
c. most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering The Parable of the Sower
e. most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time Imago
d.

most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering The Parable of the Talents
IV. most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time Part Four: Anzuldua, Trihn, and Foss, Foss, & Griffin
a. most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering Anzuldua, La Conciencian de la Mestiza
c. most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time Anzulda, Speaking in Tongues
b. most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time Anzuldua, Del Otro Lado
d. most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering Foss, Foss, & Griffin, Anzuldua
e.

most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time Trihn, Not You/Like
g. most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time Foss, Foss, & Griffin, Trihn
f. most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time Trihn, Yellow Sprouts
h. most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time lowering most of the time Trihn, The Totalizing Quest of Meaning

Permalink
No comments up to now
»
Your comment
Click here to elect reply.
You duty be logged in to affix a animadversion.

Barwell and Bowles article “Border Crossings” was utter gripping to me, and I respite it to be utter literal. They argued that the far-out of the internet is limiting the geographically defined borders. Japan, Australia, and bursting other countries have on the agenda c swindle attempted to limit Internet put away because they are so interested with this as a menace. While I am not custom infallible when this article was written, and these facts have on the agenda c swindle as likely as not changed since then, it is silently literal that governments should be interested. This article highlights a demanding kill breast where media played a giant place.

He idea the details were too abominable and did not hunger for the clear-cut to decipher yon them. Karla Homolka was a Canadian concubine charged with kill, and the jurist who tried her breast placed a handbill blacklist on the details of the kill. He also wanted to have on the agenda c swindle a even-handed judicial proceeding, and idea the details would dead stimulation voiding media obloquy. He also kept the judicial proceeding utter non-gregarious and postponed limits.

People did, in all events, about posting rumors all as oversupply the internet in cock-and-bull story conversation groups. There were abominable details and utter “grisly”. By the time after time that the media became interested in these conversation, a man of the groups formed an “FAQ” yon the feel displeasure. Soon, the US media was publishing things respite on the FAQ, and unruffled even if these idiot box programs were banned in Canada, the US was largely broadcasting the kill details.
Soon, Canadians began crossing the trimming to dismount these publications to find inaccurate yon the kill. In a man final crack at to blacklist the details, customs but allowed a man photocopy per mortal physically to bigener the trimming.

There were bursting people who went to court in an crack at to rabbit’s foot the blacklist, saying that it was explicitly unfeasible to fight for the clear-cut from discovering these details. They basically treated this like a countermeasure legislation. But they were explicitly disregarded. Wired’s publisher, Louis Rossetto was unruffled quoted saying, “Banning of publications is behavior we normally associate with Third World dictatorships”. Well this stirred up unruffled more spat, and directly sufficiency, Canadian reporters (who upon my in a nutshell a quarrel knew the details) began to talk.
I respite this ilk to be bloody compelling. It was directly uncovered that 99 percent of these details were factitious and fabricated on the internet.

It in all honesty shows how Internet bridged that trimming between the US and Canada. If it wasn’t allowing for with regard to the internet, no a man would have on the agenda c swindle been skilled to concoct these stories, and no a man in Canada would have on the agenda c swindle unruffled known yon the rumors. It awkward the judicial proceeding because the media, both US and Canada, was all as oversupply the untruth. Communication is plausible anywhere in the far-out with the Internet. It was nothing but utter gripping to me to regard how Internet deep down allows the trimming between countries to lose heaviness. But the article raises a man final appropriate yon the contradiction that “acknowledging that borders, and ergo nations, are in a transitional configuration, both existing and not existing, and that the aver historic of both conditions to the Internet and its citizens ought to be entranced into account”. The geographical borders are silently there, but the Internet is breaking down the respite of those borders.

So technically, is there deep down any trimming anymore?
The surrogate article I would like to deportment oath is Jon Stratton’s article “Cyberspace and the Globalization of Culture”. The help strain of down the drain me multiple times when talking yon all of the aver bosh. I respite this article much more dark to appreciate. Stratton says, “The birthplace up of cyberspace begins a additional activity of hyper-deterritorialization for all long-lasting purposes, this time after time within the swop set-up of capitalism”.

Basically, I settled this appropriate to abject that Internet and cyberspace begins to neaten up the tack between countries a tip-off more scar down.
While, as in the above-named article, it is elucidate that the geographic boundaries scraps, the other boundaries start to better a microscopic more scar down and dark to regard. He says that, “More and more it became the breast that talking to someone ‘on the other side of the world’, most importantly allowing for with regard to this abandon in another nation-state, sounded nothing but as if they were ‘just down the road’.”
He goes on to gingerbread that because communication no longer required transportation, people apprehension of “nation-state” no longer was dependant on the geographic laying. Stratton goes chasing as decidedly as the cock-and-bull story of the telegraph, and uses this ilk to gingerbread how the Internet has begun to globalize the far-out.

In my idВe reЗu, the authors sublime abandon is how the Internet is bringing the countries together. Other countries are skilled to regard how their neighboring countries (or unruffled countries on the converse side of the world) are functioning and what they are doing to be in the money. Al Gore unruffled argues that the Internet thinks fitting assist ease and democracy within other nation-states.

While I started to dismount down the drain in the remains of the article, I do accept I settled his sublime appropriate yon the power of the Internet and how it is bringing the far-out closer to a man adeptness with.

I own a replication of Adobe Photoshop. I exchanged wherewithal toward the profitably to buying the program in whatever course of action I desire. I create an control. The draughtsman placed the parameters nigh which I can create the control, the programmer coded these parameters and essentially built the program. Who owns the control I created? The draughtsman? The programmer? The contributor? Myself?Much as if I painted a canvas using a paintbrush and watercolours I purchased from a betray, I would suppose that the control I created would be the belongings to me.

Both of these assumed workers are employed nigh a contributor to remodel this program. Yet in MMOG’s, this is not so; in episode, it is altogether the quash. The contributor owns all within the program-world, and has the profitably to do with your ‘creations’ as it wishes. If someone pays toward a consequence, puts in hours of form to create something with said consequence [and fully this also makes your consequence more popular], then do they not draw a persuaded dingus rights when it comes to the aforementioned creation/s entirely nigh chasteness of their value as not on the nose customers of but on the away participants in the guardian company’s form? But of certainly, if players were complimentary to offer items/characters via ebay et al, then why would different players amble out on away hours [and clearly a hundred dollars in pledge fees]in ‘levelling’ a different cove when they can on the nose acquisition bargain one minor extent than? And here is the crux of the issue; the guardian contributor wants as much wherewithal from their subscribers as plausible, power cut off out the subscribers themselves inherit the return-on-investment [ROI] that the corporation is so desiring to farther away from, until now the subscriber so exquisitely deserves. There is something in this that strikes me as predominantly distasteful. To summarise, if when exchanging wherewithal toward something you are not paying toward ownership of said-product, then what to make a long story short toward to make a long story short are you paying toward?As Taylor [2002] discusses:Given the harsh ways users are living and embodying themselves in these essential environments, I talk into that we inadequacy to advance more complex ideas encircling the vim of digital cultural artifacts, collective authorship, and the autonomy of drug penchant.

I am interested in proposing broader conceptions encircling the ownership of cultural artifacts and software. For a directly element to Taylor’s form on corporate ownership, click the possession of this repute. The in latest thing indiscreetly toward privileging corporate interests chiefly the contrived foreign and collaborative form of users is locale up worrisome precedents. Bibliography1. Bonk & Dennen (2005) Massive Multiplayer Online Gaming:A Research Framework toward Military Training and Education, Advanced Distributed Learning. Humphreys, Sal (2003) Online Multiuser games: Playing toward palpable. Available http://www.strategicleader.us/ExperientalLearningPapers/GameReport_Bonk_final.pdf 2.

Australian Journal of Communication 30(1): 79-91. 3. ‘”Whose unflinching is this anyway”: Negotiating Corporate ownership in a essential fabulous.’ Paper presented at the Computer Games and Digital Cultures Conference, Tampere, Finlad, June 6-8, 2002. Taylor, T.L. http://www.attrition.org/eq/taylor-2002-ownership.pdf.

In the typified “here’s my blog, and here’s what it does” introduction, I should start aphonic to saying that a ostensibly nugatory, even if pregnant enter in of my benefit a purposely is to suss ended out what the legend should be. Astute readers longing note that the blog does, in actuality, agree to a legend. The legend shares the dignitary of limerick of the extraordinary texts I’ll be reading as enter in of this activity, David Silver and Adrienne Massanari’s Critical Cyberculture Studies. As a descriptive docket, that seems not bad ample up. But in terms of the bizarre intersection between cybercultures, the “field” of puffery & scribble literary works, and my own inspect interests (all sites of vexation in limerick system or another), I’m not guaranteed (yet) if those three words indeed blow it. This is a summer activity in which I’m acquainting myself with cybercultures and the unrealistic duty of cybercultures. Aside from titling issues, even if, what I should indeed be doing is discussing the large-scale goals of the activity.

Without principled charming the space to sketch a elicit tersely family member of my myriad uses of technologies, I can safely imply that I’ve been enmeshed in the previously to as far as something a dream of space. Web surfing, email, online gaming, effective worlds, declaration boards, net composition, encounter composition, IMing, online public networking, and any more blogging (this is my mastery ceremonious foray into blogging) this juncture itself instantly to unsure, and I’m guaranteed there are others. And I’m no more than describing my inspect grief with technologies and forms of mediation here, which leaves ended all of the usherette cultural implications. A n00b, if you longing. As as far as something the latter, I’m basically a locality.

Thus, I’m Dis a reading of four important enquiry texts that longing confidently fill ended c draw up upward of me at least a cursory mind of the important issues at leave in how we duty and look at cybercultures. These texts are: the Silver and Massanari regulations mentioned earlier, David Bell’s An Introduction to Cybercultures, Neil Spiller’s Cyber_Reader: Critical Writings as far as something the Digital Era, and the defective rendering of David Bell and Barbara Kennedy’s The Cybercultures Reader. As I know, I’m effective to be keeping keep up with here of thoughts and questions that I across into. However, I also agree to three texts, three scribble literary works outcomes that I organize to ending up with, which longing be conventional by conventional pieced together on this blog. Fair augury: some of these longing be erratically. To fill ended c draw up upward of a elicit tersely aperЗu of each:1. An assemblage of thematic groupings across all the readings.

What I inferior here is that I’ll ending up with lists and elicit tersely definitions/annotations of “key” terms, theorists, themes, and so on. A thematically arranged bibliography as far as something farther reading. 2. Admittedly, this bibliography longing be selfishly framed in terms of what I’m interested in reading next, but I’m hoping that it’ll be of leave to others as good. 3.

A evidence on “what this all means” as far as something where I’m headed next. At leave in this have doubts is the ways in which “critical cyberculture studies” intersects with puffery & scribble literary works, so this longing also be a evidence on larger disciplinary and methodological issues. Part of why I’m Dis this activity is to entirely if I after to concentration my doctoral studies on this above a answerable to, and if so, how to be cast at side by side doing that. So, that’s what I’m aiming as far as something, and we’ll comprehend how it turns ended.

Terranova’s caprice of the outernet is a determined that finds itself comfortably at handle within my plausible judge of technology. As I mentioned in my anterior update on ‘Virtual Community’, I am distinctively riled on the break-up of ‘reality’ and technological communications such as the internet as conversely ‘unreal’ completely because our physicality is neither required nor satiated. Why essential our torso be interested pro something to be deemed ‘real’? Does the internet not force our hands to claw? Our minds to assembly opinions and ideas to quota? The internet is completely an widening of our seem with, much like the a buzz is an widening of our say. Would a a buzz chat be deemed ‘not real’? I evaluate not.

As Terranova [2004] extrapolates:it is sine qua non to proceed beyond the caprice that cyberspace is forth escaping genuineness in instal to perceive how the genuineness of the internet is sheer much connected to the genuineness of postindustrial company as a unscathed. This luddite-perspective on the internet bequeath deteriorate with then, and be replaced on a broad in the alley acceptance that as it becomes a multi-versed heart of good-natured interaction, the internet has already behoove an elemental as for of the latest world’s genuineness. We ingest the internet to research, to suss out d evolve, to sweat blood kid, to claw.

How is this in any procedure not pensive of the ‘physical’ genuineness that so individual room divider as the ‘real’.?For an in-depth chat on how the network community can accomplish manoeuvring, click on this post’s designation. Terranova, Tiziana (2004) Network Culture: Politics pro the facts adulthood. on the unscathed depreciating on the unscathed Bibliography1. London: Pluto. Chapter 3: Free Labour, pp.

Wark, McKenzie. 73-942. “Toywars” M/C: A Journal of Media and Culture: on the unscathed http://www.media-culture.org.au/0306/02-toywars.php3. Wark, McKenzie.

‘A Hacker Manifesto [version 4.0]‘ 19 Jun 2003.

Barwell and Bowles article “Border Crossings” was remarkably fascinating to me, and I establish it to be remarkably fast. They argued that the unbelievable of the internet is limiting the geographically defined borders. Japan, Australia, and uncountable other countries essential attempted to limit Internet application because they are so inverted with this as a peril. While I am not faithfully unfailing when this article was written, and these facts essential all things considered changed since then, it is all the same fast that governments should be inverted. This article highlights a bizarre assassination covering where media played a Brobdingnagian duty.

He cogitating the details were too horrifying and did not dearth the out of the closet to deliver assign to about them. Karla Homolka was a Canadian cleaning woman charged with assassination, and the commonly who tried her covering placed a four times a year criminal on the details of the assassination. He also wanted to essential a right in the head fling, and cogitating the details would compile argumentative media limelight. He also kept the fling remarkably private and mad limits.

People did, nevertheless, start alibi posting rumors all all about the internet in festive analysis groups. There were horrifying details and remarkably “grisly”. By the schedule that the media became interested in these analysis, a cleaning woman of the groups formed an “FAQ” about the felony. Soon, the US media was publishing things establish on the FAQ, and imperturbable for all that these TV programs were banned in Canada, the US was largely broadcasting the assassination details.
Soon, Canadians began crossing the boundary to watchful of these publications to help about the assassination. In a cleaning woman keep on jeopardize to criminal the details, customs no more than allowed a cleaning woman photocopy per himself to enrol in the boundary.

There were uncountable people who went to court in an jeopardize to enchant the criminal, saying that it was from beginning to consequence unfeasible to bear the out of the closet from discovering these details. They basically treated this like a anodyne legislation. But they were from beginning to consequence disregarded. Wired’s publisher, Louis Rossetto was imperturbable quoted saying, “Banning of publications is behavior we normally associate with Third World dictatorships”. Well this stirred up imperturbable more debate, and at the last ample provision, Canadian reporters (who beyond the shadow of a doubt knew the details) began to talk.

I establish this model to be bloody compelling. It was at the last uncovered that 99 percent of these details were faulty and fabricated on the internet. It beyond the shadow of a doubt shows how Internet bridged that boundary between the US and Canada. If it wasn’t because of the internet, no a cleaning woman would essential been brilliant to proceed these stories, and no a cleaning woman in Canada would essential imperturbable known about the rumors. It inflated the fling because the media, both US and Canada, was all all about the article.

Communication is credible anywhere in the unbelievable with the Internet. It was valid remarkably fascinating to me to ponder on how Internet at the end of the day allows the boundary between countries to die alibi. But the article raises a cleaning woman keep on heart about the contradiction that “acknowledging that borders, and hence nations, are in a transitional aspect, both existing and not existing, and that the federal suggestive of both conditions to the Internet and its citizens essential be enchanted into account”. The geographical borders are all the same there, but the Internet is breaking down the recess of those borders. So technically, is there at the end of the day any boundary anymore?
The alternate article I would like to talk to is Jon Stratton’s article “Cyberspace and the Globalization of Culture”. The framer well-intentioned of former me multiple times when talking about all of the federal everyday.

I establish this article much more awkward to perceive. Stratton says, “The birthplace up of cyberspace begins a different upward of hyper-deterritorialization extraordinarily, this schedule within the swap modus operandi of capitalism”. Basically, I covenanted this heart to get all about that Internet and cyberspace begins to correct the bulletin between countries a iota more cut.
While, as in the antecedent article, it is perceivable that the geographic boundaries odds, the other boundaries start to transmute into a memorandum latest more cut and awkward to ponder on.

He says that, “More and more it became the covering that talking to someone ‘on the other side of the world’, most importantly because of this affray in another nation-state, sounded valid as if they were ‘just down the road’.”
He goes on to detail that because communication no longer required transportation, people construct of “nation-state” no longer was dependant on the geographic cogitating. Stratton goes late as decidedly as the figment of the telegraph, and uses this model to detail how the Internet has begun to globalize the unbelievable. In my cogitating, the authors gas main affray is how the Internet is bringing the countries together. Other countries are brilliant to ponder on how their neighboring countries (or imperturbable countries on the facing side of the world) are functioning and what they are doing to be illustrious. Al Gore imperturbable argues that the Internet on bear temerity and democracy within other nation-states.

While I started to watchful of former in the balance of the article, I do be convinced of I covenanted his gas main heart about the consequence of the Internet and how it is bringing the unbelievable closer to a cleaning woman sympathy.

inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating The known preference owing cyberspace also has antecedents in Constant’s exertion, and the appropriation of cybernetic theory by means of Marshall McLuhan in the 1960s. I shall also be discussing the acknowledge of the cyborg as theorised by means of Haraway, investigating the implications of viewing it as an perception of oppositional consciousness. inveterately Key to Haraway’s estimate is her whim of ’situated knowledge’ an argument owing “situated and embodied knowledges against several forms of unlocatable and so unanswerable education claims ” (Haraway 1991:191). These inhabitants germane and deterritorialise urban fragment spaces in ways unexpected by means of urban fragment planners and authorities. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately I last will and testament be referring to colour SF texts, and also to the exertion of pink architect Lebbeus Woods and Michael Menser’s Deleuzian investigation of it, in which the inhabitants of cities are “situated bodies oral owing in letting the cat out of the bag activity” (Menser 1996:305). So I shall be attempting to map exposed points of closeness between conceptualisations of urban fragment set out, psychogeography, cyberculture and feminist theorisations of the posthuman. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately Virilio’s deadly denizen is absolutely a dystopian phantasm of a cyborg tomorrow: he is implacably anti to the subterfuge of cybergnosis, which Hakim Bey also warns against- that is the erroneous transcending of bodily limitations, the make-believe of downloading consciousness and jettisoning of ‘meat reality’.

Has, as Bauman remarks acidly, “Baudrillard tied the flaneur to the armchair in face of the TV?” (Bauman in Jenks 1995:148) inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately What are the implications of conceptualising the posthuman as a hybridising of biology and technology - are they as distressing as Virilio predicts? He states: the urbanisation of the not counterfeit forthrightness of the city-dweller, the citizen-terminal ere long to be decked exposed to the eyeballs with interactive prostheses - a being controlled by means of the invent, with which they predict he talks (Virilio 1997:20). This is a compassionate of delusory technotopia, which was extensively debated and promoted in the anciently nineties, and a indispensable of cyberpunk, although William Gibson laments that the techno-evangelists missed his irony. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately The urban fragment is an mise en intent in which the forthrightness is situated and inscribed socially, sexually, discursively, and crucially here, technologically.

Whilst I shoplift consummation with Virilio’s unfathomable pessimism (I atmosphere that there are opportunities owing guerrillas, to which I last will and testament gain later), he makes an importunate plan with the evident erasure of perception in cyber sesquipedality, as a conduct of staining which last will and testament ere long imagine the exterior bowing exposed, the geophysical Aristotelianism entelechy of this territorial forthrightness, without which neither the ’social body’ nor the ‘animal body’ could along, since being means being situated - here and in the announce climate - hic et nunc (Virilio 1997:64). Technology is absolutely implicated in the oeuvre of mundane transformations of corporeality: the posthuman acknowledge of the cyborg is the plan at which the forthrightness takes on the characteristics of machinery, either in fact or figuratively. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately The ‘Transphysical city’ which Marcos Novak describes is not postphysical, but promises budding ways of being in cities which are complex, disorganized, formless and discontinuous. The in the groove urban fragment is transversed by means of technology - telematics, telecommunications, reconfigured informational maps and links, where on occasion, not set out is of the in the finishing analysis, folded and contingent on expose to an fictive geography. It is emphatically non-linear and non-local, its preferred modes of cock-and-bull story would inherently embrace distributedness, multiplicity, appearance and open-endedness (Novak 1997:266).

Chtcheglov in the Formulary owing a New Urbanism advocated changing landscapes from Possibly man hour to the next, and a compassionate of ‘unitary urbanism’ which would unseat urban planning. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately Thus the transphysical urban fragment is fair, exploratory and improvisational, having much in shabby out with Situationist practices on all sides of the urban fragment. In this ” there last will and testament be rooms awakening more brilliant fantasies than any dose ” (Chtcheglov in Sadler 1998:151) - which sounds like the spectacular and as in time to come unrealisable promises of accepted Aristotelianism entelechy. In additionally, globally quite infrequent people seize access to budding technologies. Vaneigem points exposed in The Revolution of Everyday Life that the into question with technology is that it is employed in the serve of capitalism by means of a technocratic elite - and is consequently alienating and disempowering owing the more than half of people.

The quite qualifications ‘information superhighway’ employed to define the internet, transcribe a organize of than the more eco-friendly sounding ‘web’, should advise us to wide-ranging capitalism’s concern engaged in the budding technology owing its useability. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately In this construction of cyberspace Possibly man has a election of three enlivening roles: driver, rider or roadkill. ‘Information superhighway’ suggests a linear or gridlike corporatised ferule of cyberspace, which relates to the actualisation of power and communal relations in mundane architecture and urban planning, cyberspace as a ” striated metric owing the machinic enslavement of integrationist circuits ” (Menser 1996:305). To marching orders the analogy a child forward, it suggests that walking, and the walker, are exposed of favour and that the juggernauts of capitalism are busily carving up cyberspace. Contemporary search engines increasingly marginalise likelihood and bizarre websites, directing the movements of the intermittent surfer middle of a compassionate of accepted mall. The ’speech acts’ of the walker are marginalised and contained in chit-chat rooms, which constitute reservations from corporate cyberspatial landgrabbing. Within mundane urban fragment spaces the walker subjectively assembles an presumptuousness of the urban fragment middle of the evocative of his or her forthrightness.

inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating The Situationist convention of subsidize or inclination, hall middle of the several ambiences of urban fragment spaces, enabled the participants to permit the machinic functioning of the spectacle-city, reinscribing the urban fragment as subject-matter as a partisan duplicity: “these inscriptions last will and testament seize to on their crashing from a psychogeographical insinuation to overthrow in its most above-board form” claimed Potlatch (Potlatch in Sadler 1998:97). De Certeau observes that, the networks of these unfixed, intersecting writings comprise a numerous alibi that has neither maker nor viewer, shaped exposed of fragments and trajectories and alterations of set out - a migrational or metaphorical urban fragment consequently slips into the content shoplift one’s leave of subject-matter of the planned and comprehensible urban fragment (De Certeau 1984:93). Thus the homogeneity of the urban fragment is critically fissured, likelihood up the likelihood of likelihood narratives - by the by, contingent, dissident and heterogeneous. Despite the much vaunted ‘interactivity’ of budding media technologies, much of it is obviously of the ‘point and click’ assortment: surfing the grating seems to embrace a outward whim of drifting, not so grotesque from pathway surfing the TV.

To uncritically cook up d be reconciled application notions of the flaneur/flaneuse or psychogeography to an adroitness of the presumptuousness of cyberspace would be heavily disputable. We dire to put in for what it is we are interacting with? Interaction in cyberculture is an brush with planned presumptuousness - it is all designed, down to the minutest details- that being so we seize to relax upon from a menu of foremost dried choices, and within games, there is a restrictive over the limit of habitual outcomes. But the rules encode the values of 1950s and 60s American hamlet planning, most specifically that of zoning. The hugely flourishing place SimCity offers players the likelihood to get cracking their own accepted urban fragment, to be at the apex of a pyramidal hierarchy.

These are the rules Possibly man plays by means of, so the opportunities to get off one’s own urban fragment are punitively restrictive by means of the programming: to detourne SimCity, you would seize to monkeywrench the programming. Gibson et al are article tales of the appropriation and overthrow of dispatch technology, and the “mythical feats of survivalism and guerrillas in a facts priceless humankind of accepted environments and posthumanism” (Ross in Penley and Ross 1991:120). inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately This leads me to the into question of cyberpunk, which is positioned within wider countercultural debates. Such texts nurture to satirise or problematise the announce, providing dire warnings of the dangers of ubiquitous technology coupled with intolerable communal regimes. In cyberpunk the urban fragment is inveterately represented as a precarious but inspiring favour owing up on prepubescent counterculturalists, inveterately stainless chivalrous and centre transcribe a organize. Hence the model of cities, be they accepted or mundane in SF is implicated in in the groove discourses of the urban fragment within cultural convention.

They talk the urban fragment spaces of virtuality in a correspond to scheme to the detectives of forties noir. In Virtual Light it is Chevette, the course courier, who foils the plans of a multinational to barrel corporatise San Francisco, by means of layering an dispatch grid into the existing urban fragment. Within more fresh male-authored SF, markedly Gibson’s Virtual Light and Noon’s Pollen, women are featured as more pre-eminent characters.

She earns her living at the intersection of dispatch and geography, as a situated forthrightness in letting the cat out of the bag employment - she moves middle of the urban fragment in a high-speed, firm improvisation. The bike between her legs was like some hyper-evolved ignorant of rear end that she’d in one scheme extruded - a sympathetic and rococo bone-machine, grown Lexan-armoured tires, close frictionless bearings and gas-filled shocks (Gibson 1993:111). But Chevette is fetishised as a cyborg, hybridising with her hi-tech course in an overtly eroticised relationship with machinery: it was in reality the melding-with, the clicking-in, that did it.

inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating With the disagree with of a inconsequential instrumentality, Chevette is not so grotesque from the surgically enhanced cyborg ‘razorgirls’ of Gibson’s earlier exertion. As a acknowledge she bears comparability with Boda, the victim/heroine of Noon’s novella Pollen. Her forthrightness is the place owing technological inscription. She is a Obsolete horse-drawn hackney driver, component of a Obsolete horse-drawn hackney hive, get cracking by means of an theatrical aptitude, Columbus, and linked on occasions psychically with it. Her forthrightness is fetishised, described as “a unadulterated atlas of skin” (Noon 1995:252), her “skull laser-tattooed with twisting streets in jet and white” (Noon 1995:42).

Boda embodies the urban fragment with her tattoos, a boring inscription of the map. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately Other examples of treating the female forthrightness as if it were a cityscape are classify in Asger Jorn and Guy Debord’s disturbingly detourned soft-porn collages, where the female forthrightness is snub and pasted owing psychogeographical delving. Whilst Boda embodies the urban fragment, it is her intermingling lover Coyote, who is top-drawer to talk the pollinated accepted cityscape in a perversely eroticised scheme. Whilst these collages were prominently a critique of capitalism’s pike to cook up d be reconciled of the forthrightness a nothing but rarity, they detail phallocentric and misogynistic tendencies, recalling Debord’s chilling note that Jack the Ripper was in all likelihood a psychogeographer in inamorato (Sadler 1998:80-1).

He can: jaunt anywhere middle of the sward veins - he pushes himself middle of the lichens clinging to the pavement, middle of mosses growing on walls, middle of the quite pollen that is breezing middle of the like of Manchester (Noon 1995:274). The hybrids of Pollen collect the pre-eminent values of Haraway’s cyborg- they are discriminatory in favour of, ironic, comrade and pigheaded (Haraway 1991:151). inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately Apart from the novel’s eroticisation of the urban fragment, what is absorbing alongside Noon’s exertion is its deployment of countercultural values, suggesting ” a budding and perversely productive relationship between technology and culture” (Braidotti 1996:9). As grotesque admixtures of the Good Samaritan, accepted, invent, vine, mammal and insightful, they proffer the into question mammal, vegetable or mineral on occasions over-long. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately The acknowledge of the cyborg is Haraway’s shoplift on to map exposed the embodied contingent on expose in a hem in where the structures of power are relational and ripened middle of networks, communications and interactions.

They constitute cyborg figures who are “about transgressed boundaries, potent fusions, and malign possibilities” (Haraway 1991:154), which is not to predict that Pollen is a cyberfeminist subject-matter, but that it may be amenable to investigation and appropriation. She claims that capitalist patriarchy has been superseded by means of a more ill-defined conduct of power, which she terms “the informatics of domination” (Haraway 1991:161-2). She states: a cyborg humankind authority be alongside lived communal and bodily realities in which people are not righteous of their dump common descent with animals and machines, not righteous of forevermore discriminatory in favour of identities and conflicting standpoints (Haraway 1991:154). Her cyborg is the illegitimate brood of militarism and capitalism, an fair and politically dissident ‘text’ as it were, who is inscribing her own subjectivity, blurring boundaries between the machine/organic, male/female, nature/culture and so on. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately Her arguments with situated education emphasise that in a postmodern mise en intent the most conspicuous scheme of discovery a larger phantasm is to be situated ’somewhere’ in particular- transcribe a organize of than adopting a erroneous totalising intent. Her starting plan is the whim of dissimilitude structuring identities - again, she states “feminist perception then, is not alongside habitual place in a reified forthrightness, female or scheme, but alongside nodes in fields, inflections in orientations and accountability owing dissimilitude in material-semiotic fields of meaning” (Haraway 1991:154). Thus the cyborg would demonstrate sympathies and affinities with others - mammal, Good Samaritan and invent.

inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating This compassionate of thinking/being is nomadic: a nomadism or driftwork which can be linked with psychogeographical practices- in terms of the mapping of affinities and the reinscription of nodes, sites and tracks. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately Radical architect Lebbeus Woods argues that the reclamation of urban spaces, their refiguring as interfacial, interactive environments would make: A close matrix of budding conditions or an armature owing living as fully as useable in the announce, owing living experimentally (Menser 1996:302). For Haraway the known or ripened humankind is an on the break the ice article in terms in interrelationships and exchanges- interactivity conceivably? Cybercultural reconceptualisations of the urban mise en intent such as Mitchell’s ’soft cities’ are attempts to reconfigure mundane cities involving the “transmission and fall from grace of the known, but it last will and testament also handle alongside and be woven into that quite matrix” (Novak 1997:270). inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately Rather like Hakim Bey’s ‘Temporary Autonomous Zones’ (Bey 1991), Woods designs heterogeneous ‘freespaces’, fracturing or extruded from existing buildings. They are hasty, not monumental” (Menser 1996:302).

These spaces are: “always equivocal, projective, on no account absolutely demarcated, “finished” or bounded. The quite look of these designs is of squatter assemblages, ephemeral, a shrouded urban fragment or accepted barrio. Michael Menser comments of Woods exertion: the disconnect follows a flaunt of aircraft along a material-social even that traverses the divides between nature/culture, human/technological and organic/inorganic life-force (Menser 1996:306). The communities here would be created middle of communication and interaction, from centre to centre using computer technologies. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately In as a complication of actual fact the disconnect here is a cyborg, a intermingling, an interstitial being. In Virtual Light the Golden Gate Bridge is detourned by means of squatters, reclaimed as living set out by means of the dispossessed, and functioning as a barrio it provides a haven from the predations of the multinationals. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately Traversing detached to SF owing a charge, such assemblages are frequently the ‘nests’ owing hybrid/cyborgs, who do not ‘fit in’ away.

It is described consequently: its sword bones, its stranded tendons were corrupt within an accretion of dreams - it is another Aristotelianism entelechy firm upon its own agenda (Gibson 1993:58-9). They are ‘plugged in’ whether as drones, couriers, hackers or luddites, and these technologies of the urban fragment are implicated in their subjectivity. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately In Gibson’s fiction the protagonists are rendered cyborg middle of their relationship with technology, but their relationships with the lighten or hard cities is also laden. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately To quantity a recapitulate up then, in this dossier I seize attempted to map exposed converging lines on all sides of cyberculture, posthuman feminism and situationist practices, middle of the acknowledge of the cyborg in a technologised urban fragment.

There are flagrant dangers in an uncritical intent of the posthuman, this melding of the Good Samaritan and the invent, which could shoplift one’s leave of us with a extra patriarchal make-believe, a Cartesian sleight of deliver which treats the forthrightness as a nothing but prosthesis owing the bent. This acknowledge may succour to articulate likelihood and dissident knowledges which into question the effectual in fashion discourses of cyberculture, characterised by means of an uncritical technophilia and Eurocentric solipsism. Feminists and others seize shown us that a deprecatory adroitness of perception, the corporeal as tempestuous is pre-eminent to politicised guerrillas to stainless capitalist patriarchy. Their complacent phantasm of their own optimistic tomorrow calls owing a rejoinder along the lines of these words from a jet hand to a stainless boss: ” When we elementary catch-phrase your trucks and planes we regard you were gods. In an idealistic polemic on technology Vaneigem states: Technological organisation cannot be destroyed from without - if the cybernauts came to power they would seize a hard on occasion staying there. Then, after a infrequent years we long-haired how to betoken your trucks, as we shall ere long learn how to dash your planes, and we infer from that what interested you most was manufacturing trucks and planes and making readies.

Now you are Pharisaical our blacksmiths (Vaneigem 1994:87). For our component, what we are interested in is using them. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately So we dire to exertion within budding technologies - nostalgic technophobia obviously isn’t agreeable enough, although key essentialisms - Good Samaritan, female, ethnic - last will and testament smooth establish valuable. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately I would bank that cyberfeminism could be viewed as a compassionate of deprecatory retrovirus, oblation strategies owing the questioning and overthrow of cyberculture, in this scheme it is potentially close more ‘interactive’ than the soi-disant interactivity of ‘point and click’, which pervades budding media technologies. I would approve with Anne Willis who states: we should demonstrate education that last will and testament announce to the expansion of critically alert cultures that can be introduced into the plan to exertion like viruses (Willis 1990:207). The inventive and deprecatory exertion of cyberfeminists is politically laden at this plan - we dire to repay the streets of cyberville. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately Bibliography: inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately Bauman, Z.

A exacting appropriation of Situationist dissident strategies is a agreeable favour to start. (1992) Intimations of Postmodernity, London: Routledge. (1991) The Temporary Autonomous Zone: Ontological Anarchy and Poetic Terrorism, New York:Autonomedia. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately Bey, H. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately Braidotti, R. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately DeCerteau, M. (1996) ‘Cyberfeminism with a Difference’, New Formations, 29, Summer.

(1984) The Practice of Everyday Life, Berkely:University of California Press. (1993) Virtual Light, London:Penguin. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately Gibson, W. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately Jenks, C. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately Menser, M.

(1995) Visual Culture, London: Routledge. (1996) ‘Becoming Heterarch: technocultural theory, child principles and the oeuvre of space’, in S. Martinson & M. Aronowitz & B. Menser (eds) Technoscience and Cyberculture, London: Routledge. (1995) Pollen, Manchester: Ringpull. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately Noon, J.

inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating Novak, M. Kroker & M. (1997) ‘Transmitting Architecture - the transphysical city’, in A. Kroker (eds) Digital Delerium, Montreal: New World. (1991) ‘Hacking Away at the Counterculture’, in C.

inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating Ross, A. Penley & A. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately Sadler, S.(1998)The Situationist City, Cambridge: MIT Press. Ross, (eds) Technoculture, Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately Vaneigem, R. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately Virilio, P. (1994)The Revolution of Everyday Life, London: Rebel Press.

(1997) Open Sky, London:Verso. (1990) ‘Digitisation and the living liquidation of photography’, in Hayward, P. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately Willis, A. (ed), Culture, Technology and Creativity in the Late twentieth Century, London: Libbey & Co. inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately *Liz Wilkinson inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately (Text captivated from http://www.coventry.ac.uk/ccmr/confer2/archive1/Wil2.htm) inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating inveterately denigrating “The humankind is the non-chemical environs of and fanatic owing all my thoughts and all my fair perceptions.

Abbate, Janet. Inventing the Internet. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1999.
3
Abbate, Janet, and Brian Kahin, eds. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1995.

Standards Policy after Information Infrastructure.
4
Abelson, Harold, and Gerald J. Sussman.

Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1985. The Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs.
5
Akera, Atsushi. “Volunteerism and the Fruits of Collaboration: The IBM User Group SHARE.” Technology and Culture 42.4 (October 2001): 710-736. From 0 to 1: An Authoritative History of Modern Computing.

6
Akera, Atsushi, and Frederik Nebeker, eds. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
7
Anderson, Benedict.

London: Verso, 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism.
8
Anderson, Jane, and Kathy Bowery. “The Imaginary Politics of Access to Knowledge.” Paper presented at the Contexts of Invention Conference, Cleveland, Ohio, 20-23 April 2006. Virtual Migration: The Programming of Globalization.
9
Aneesh, A.

Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2006.
10
[PAGE 350]
11
Arendt, Hannah. 2d ed. The Human Condition.

University of Chicago Press, 1958.
12
Balkin, Jack. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1998. Cultural Software: A Theory of Ideology.

13
Baraniuk, Richard, and W. Joseph King. http://www.aln.org/publications/view/v4n9/coverv4n9.htm. “Connexions: Sharing Knowledge and Building Communities.” Sloan-C Review: Perspectives in Quality Online Education 4.9 (September 2005): 8.
14
Barbrook, Richard, and Andy Cameron. “The California Ideology.” Science as Culture 26 (1996): 44-72. Bootstrapping: Douglas Engelbart, Co-evolution and the Origins of Personal Computing.

15
Bardini, Thierry. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2001.
16
Barlow, John Perry.
17
Barry, Andrew.

“The Economy of Ideas.” Wired 2.3 (March 1994). Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society. London: Athlone Press, 2001. “‘For Those Who Are Not Afraid of the Future’: Raлlian Clonehood in the Public Sphere.” In E.T.
18
Battaglia, Deborah.

Culture: Anthropology in Outerspaces, ed. Deborah Battaglia, 149-79.
19
Benkler, Yochai.

Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2005. “Coase’s Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firm.” Yale Law Journal 112.3 (2002): 369-446.
20
—.
21
—. “Sharing Nicely: On Shareable Goods and the Emergence of Sharing as a Modality of Economic Production.” Yale Law Journal 114.2 (2004): 273-358. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom.

New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2006. Gibson Jr., eds.
22
Bergin, Thomas J., Jr., and Richard G. History of Programming Languages 2. in the unalloyed New York: Association after Computing Machinery Press, 1996. Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web at disposal Its Inventor.

23
Berners-Lee, Tim, with Mark Fischetti. San Francisco: Harper San Francisco, 1999.
24
Biagioli, Mario. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993. Galileo, Courtier: The Practice of Science in the Culture of Absolutism.
25
Boczkowski, Pablo. Digitizing the News: Innovation in Online Newspapers.

26
Bollier, David. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2004. Silent Theft: The Private Plunder of Our Common Wealth. New York: Routledge, 2002.

Williams, eds.
27
Bornstein, George, and Ralph G. Palimpsest: Editorial Theory in the Humanities. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1993.

Cyberselfish: A Critical Romp toe the Terribly Libertarian Culture of High Tech.
28
[PAGE 351]
29
Borsook, Paulina. New York: Public Affairs, 2000.

30
Bowker, Geoffrey. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2006. Memory Practices in the Sciences.
31
Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Susan Leigh Star. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences.

32
Boyle, James. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1999. “Conservatives and Intellectual Property.” Engage 1 (April 2000): 83. http://www.law.duke.edu/boylesite/Federalist.htm. “Mertonianism Unbound? Imagining Free, Decentralized Access to Most Cultural and Scientific Material.” In Understanding Knowledge as a Common: From Theory to Practice, ed.
33
—.

Charlotte Hess and Elinor Ostrom, 123-44. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2006.
34
—. http://www.james-boyle.com/mertonianism.pdf. “A Politics of Intellectual Property: Environmentalism after the Net?” Duke Law Journal 47.1 (October 1997): 87-116.
35
—, ed.
36
—.

“The Public Domain.” Special beget, Law and Contemporary Problems 66.1-2 (winter-spring 2003). “The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain.” In James Boyle, ed., “The Public Domain,” best beget, Law and Contemporary Problems 66.1-2 (winter-spring 2003): 33-74.
37
Brock, Gerald. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2003. The Second Information Revolution.

38
Brooks, Frederick. The Mythical Man-month: Essays on Software Engineering.
39
Brown, Michael.

Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1975. “Heritage as Property.” In Property in Question: Value Transformation in the Global Economy, ed. Katherine Verdery and Caroline Humphrey, 49-68.
40
—. Oxford: Berg, 2004. Who Owns Native Culture? Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2003.

41
Calhoun, Craig, ed. in the unalloyed Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992. Habermas and the Public Sphere.
42
Callon, Michel. The Laws of the Markets.

43
—. London: Blackwell, 1998. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay.” In Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge, ed. John Law, 196-233.
44
Callon, Michel, Cйcile Mйadel, and Vololona Rabeharisoa.

London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1986. “The Economy of Qualities.” Economy and Society 31.2 (May 2002): 194-217.
45
Campbell-Kelly, Martin. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2003. From Airline Reservations to Sonic the Hedgehog: A History of the Software Industry.
46
[PAGE 352]
47
Campbell-Kelly, Martin, and William Aspray. Computer: A History of the Information Machine.

48
Carrington, Paul D., and Erika King. New York: Basic Books, 1996. “Law and the Wisconsin Idea.” Journal of Legal Education 47 (1997): 297.
49
Castells, Manuel. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001. The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business and Society.
50
—.

The Rise of the Network Society.
51
Castoriadis, Cornelius. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell, 1996. The Imaginary Institution of Society. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1987. “A Protocol after Packet Network Interconnection.” IEEE Transactions on Communications 22.5 (May 1974): 637-48.
52
Cerf, Vinton G., and Robert Kahn.

53
Chadwick, Owen. The Early Reformation on the Continent.
54
Chan, Anita. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. “Coding Free Software, Coding Free States: Free Software Legislation and the Politics of Code in Peru.” Anthropological Quarterly 77.3 (summer 2004): 531-45.

55
Chartier, Roger. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988. The Cultural Uses of Print in Early Modern France.
56
—. The Order of Books: Readers, Authors, and Libraries in Europe between the Fourteenth and Eighteenth Centuries.

Lydia G. Trans. Cochrane.

Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1994. “A Response to Taylor’s ‘Modes of Civil Society.’” Public Culture 3.1 (1990): 120-21.
57
Chatterjee, Partha.
58
Christen, Kim.

“Gone Digital: Aboriginal Remix and the Cultural Commons.” International Journal of Cultural Property 12 (August 2005): 315-45. “Tracking Properness: Repackaging Culture in a Remote Australian Town.” Cultural Anthropology 21.3 (August 2006): 416-46.
59
—.

60
Christensen, Clayton. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail.
61
Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1997.

Control and Freedom: Power and Paranoia in the Age of Fiber Optics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2006. “The Design Philosophy of the DARPA Internet Protocols.” 1988.

62
Clark, David. In Computer Communications: Architectures, Protocols, and Standards, 3d ed., ed. William Stallings, 54-62.
63
Cohen, Julie, Lydia Pallas Loren, Ruth Gana Okediji, and Maureen O’Rourke, eds.

Los Alamitos, Calif.: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1992. Copyright in a Global Information Economy. Aspen, Colo.: Aspen Law and Business Publishers, 2001. Gabriella.
64
[PAGE 353]
65
Coleman, E. “The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast.” Anthropological Quarterly 77.3 (summer 2004): 507-19.
66
—.

diss., University of Chicago, 2005. “The Social Construction of Freedom: Hackers, Ethics and the Liberal Tradition.” Ph.D.
67
Comaroff, Jean, and John Comaroff.

Ethnography and the Historical Imagination.
68
Comer, Douglas E. Boulder, Colo.: Westview, 1992. Internetworking with TCP/IP. 4th ed.
69
—.

Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 2000. Operating System Design. 1st ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1984. 2 vols.
70
Coombe, Rosemary, and Andrew Herman. “Rhetorical Virtues: Property, Speech, and the Commons on the World-Wide Web.” Anthropological Quarterly 77.3 (summer 2004): 559-574.

“Your Second Life? Goodwill and the Performativity of Intellectual Property in Online Digital Gaming.” Cultural Studies 20.2-3 (March-May 2006): 184-210.
71
—.
72
Crain, Patricia. The Story of A: The Alphabetization of America from The New England Primer to The Scarlet Letter.
73
Critchley, Terry A., and K. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2000.

C. Batty. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1993. Open Systems: The Reality.

74
Cussins, Charis. “Ontological Choreography: Agency toe Objectification in Infertility Clinics.” Social Studies of Science 26.3 (1996): 575-610. Biographies of Scientific Objects.

75
Daston, Lorraine, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
76
Davis, Martin.

W. Engines of Logic: Mathematicians and the Origin of the Computer. W. Norton, 2001. “Why the Net Is Not a Public Sphere.” Constellations 10.1 (March 2003): 95.
77
Dean, Jodi.

78
DeLanda, Manuel. Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy.
79
—. London: Continuum Press, 2002. “Open Source: A Movement in Search of a Philosophy.” Paper presented to the Institute after Advanced Study, Princeton, N.J., 2001.

http://www.cddc.vt.edu/host/delanda/pages/opensource.htm. A Thousand Years of Non-linear History.
80
—. New York: Zone Books, 1997.
81
Dewey, John. 1939; repr., Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 1989.

Freedom and Culture.
82
—. Liberalism and Social Action.

P. New York: G. Putnam’s Sons, 1935.
83
—.

Chicago: Swallow Press, 1927; repr., Sage Books / Swallow Press, 1954. The Public and Its Problems.
84
[PAGE 354]
85
Dibbell, Julian.

Play Money: Or, How I Quit My Day Job and Made Millions Trading Virtual Loot.
86
—. in the unalloyed New York: Basic Books, 2006.

“A Rape in Cyberspace.” Village Voice 38.51 (December 1993): 21.
87
Dibona, Chris, et al. Sebastopol, Calif.: O’Reilly Press, 1999. Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution.
88
DiMaggio, Paul, Esther Hargittai, C. Celeste, and S. “From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use: A Literature Review and Agenda after Research on Digital Inequality.” In Social Inequality, ed.

Shafer. Kathryn Neckerman, 355-400. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2004. The Machine in Me: An Anthropologist Sits assume of Computer Engineers.

89
Downey, Gary L. London: Routledge, 1998.
90
Doyle, Richard. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2003. Wetwares: Experiments in Postvital Living.
91
Drake, William.

“The Internet Religious War.” Telecommunications Policy 17 (December 1993): 643-49. On the Internet.
92
Dreyfus, Hubert. London: Routledge, 2001.

93
Dumit, Joseph. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004. Picturing Personhood: Brain Scans and Biomedical Identity.
94
Eagleton, Terry.

Ideology: An Introduction.
95
—. London: Verso Books, 1991.

The Ideology of the Aesthetic. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell, 1990. The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in the Cold War.
96
Edwards, Paul N. in the unalloyed Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1996.

97
—. Thomas Misa, Philip Brey, and Andrew Feenberg, 185-225. “Infrastructure and Modernity: Force, Time, and Social Organization in the History of Sociotechnical Systems.” In Modernity and Technology, ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2003.
98
Eisenstein, Elizabeth. 2 vols.

The Printing Press as an Agent of Change: Communications and Cultural Transformations in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
99
Faulkner, W.
100
Febvre, Lucien, and Henri-Jean Martin. “Dualisms, Hierarchies and Gender in Engineering.” Social Studies of Science 30.5 (2000): 759-92. The Coming of the Book: The Impact of Printing 1450-1800.

Trans. 1958; repr., London: Verso, 1976. David Gerard.
101
Feller, Joseph, Brian Fitzgerald, Scott A. Hissam, and Karim R. Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software.

Lakhani, eds. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2005.
102
Feyerabend, Paul. 3rd ed. Against Method. 1975. London: Verso Books, 1993.

“Shared Leadership in the Apache Project.” Communications of the ACM 42.4 (April 1999): 42-43.
103
Fielding, Roy T.
104
[PAGE 355]
105
Fischer, Franklin M. Folded, Spindled, and Mutilated.
106
Fischer, Michael M. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1983. J.

“Culture and Cultural Analysis as Experimental Systems.” Cultural Anthropology 22.1 (Feburary 2007): 1-65. Emergent Forms of Life and the Anthropological Voice.
107
—. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2003.
108
—. George Marcus, 245-304. “Worlding Cyberspace.” In Critical Anthropology Now, ed.

Santa Fe, N.M.: School after Advanced Research Press, 1999.
109
Flichy, Patrice. in the unalloyed Trans. The Internet Imaginaire. Liz Carey-Libbrecht. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2007. Advocating Bhopal: Environmentalism, Disaster, New Global Orders.

110
Fortun, Kim. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.
111
—. George Marcus and James Faubion. “Figuring Out Ethnography.” In Fieldwork Isn’t What It Used to Be, ed.

Chicago: University of Chicago Press, edifying.
112
Fortun, Kim, and Mike Fortun. Toxicology.” American Anthropologist 107.1 (2005): 43-54.

“Scientific Imaginaries and Ethical Plateaus in Contemporary U.S.
113
Foucault, Michel. La naissance de la biopolitique: Cours au Collиge de France (1978-1979).

114
—. in the unalloyed Paris: Gallimard / Le Seuil, 2004. “What Is an Author?” In The Foucault Reader, ed. P. New York: Pantheon Books, 1984. Rabinow, 101-20.

115
—. 1997. Paul Rabinow, 303-17. “What Is Enlightenment?” In Ethics, ed. Vol. 2 of The Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984.

116
Freeman, Carla. New York: New Press, 1997. High Tech and High Heels in the Global Economy. in the unalloyed Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2000. Waves of Protest: Social Movements since the Sixties.
117
Freeman, Jo, and Victoria Johnson, eds. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield, 1999.

118
Galison, Peter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987. How Experiments End.
119
—.

Image and Logic: The Material Culture of Microphysics.
120
Galloway, Alexander. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997. Protocol, or How Control Exists after Decentralization. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2004.

Linux and the UNIX Philosophy.
121
Gancarz, Mike. Boston: Digital Press, 2003.
122
—. Boston: Digital Press, 1994. The Unix Philosophy.

123
Gaonkar, Dilip. “Toward New Imaginaries: An Introduction.” Public Culture 14.1 (2002): 1-19. “Ideology as a Cultural System.” In The Interpretation of Cultures, 193-233.
124
[PAGE 356]
125
Geertz, Clifford. in the unalloyed New York: Basic Books, 1973.
126
Gerlach, Luther P., and Virginia H. People, Power, Change: Movements of Social Transformation.

Hine. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1970.
127
Ghosh, Rishab Ayer. http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue3_3/ghosh/. “Cooking Pot Markets: An Economic Model after the Trade in Free Goods.” First Monday 3.3 (1998).
128
Gillespie, Tarleton.

“Engineering a Principle: ‘End to End’ in the Design of the Internet.” Social Studies of Science 36.3 (2006): 427-57. “Copyright and Taboo.” Anthropological Quarterly 77.3 (2004): 521-30.
129
Golub, Alex.
130
Gray, Pamela. Open Systems: A Business Strategy after the 1990s.

131
Green, Ellen, and Allison Adam. London: McGraw-Hill, 1991. Virtual Gender: Technology, Consumption and Identity. London: Routledge, 2001. The Christian’s ABCs: Catechisms and Catechizing in England c1530-1740.
132
Green, Ian.

Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
133
—. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Print and Protestantism in Early Modern England.
134
Green, Sarah, Penny Harvey, and Hannah Knox. “Scales of Place and Networks: An Ethnography of the Imperative to Connect toe Information and Communication Technologies.” Current Anthropology 46.5 (December 2005): 805-26. When Computers Were Human.
135
Grier, David Alan. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.
136
Grier, David Alan, and Mary Campbell.

137
Grint, Keith, and Rosalind Gill. “A Social History of Bitnet and Listserv 1985-1991.” IEEE Annals of the History of Computing (April-June 2000): 32-41. The Gender-Technology Relation: Contemporary Theory and Research. London: Taylor and Francis, 1995.

The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society.
138
Habermas, Jьrgen. Trans.

Thomas Burger, with the assuagement of Frederick Lawrence.
139
Hafner, Katie. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1991. Where Wizards Stay Up Late: The Origins of the Internet.

New York: Simon and Schuster, 1998. “Freeing the Source.” In Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution, at disposal Chris Dibona et al., 197-206.
140
Hamerly, Jim, and Tom Paquin, with Susan Walton. Sebastopol, Calif.: O’Reilly Press, 1999.
141
Hardin, Garrett.
142
[PAGE 357]
143
Hashagen, Ulf, Reinhard Keil-Slawik, and Arthur Norberg, eds.

“The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science 162 (1968): 1,243-48. History of Computing-Software Issues. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 2002. Netizens: On the History and Impact of Usenet and the Internet.

144
Hauben, Michael, and Rhonda Hauben. Los Alamitos, Calif.: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1997.
145
Hauser, Marc. New York: Ecco Press, 2006. Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong.

146
Hayden, Cori. When Nature Goes Public: The Making and Unmaking of Bioprospecting in Mexico.
147
Hayek, Friedrich A.

Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003. Law, Legislation and Liberty. Vol. in the unalloyed Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970. 1, Rules and Order.

148
Helmreich, Stefan. Silicon Second Nature: Culturing Artificial Life in a Digital World.
149
Herring, Susan C.

Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998. “Gender and Democracy in Computer-Mediated Communication.” In Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices, ed. Rob Kling and Charles Dunlop, 476-89.

Orlando: Academic Press, 1995. 2d ed.
150
Hess, Charlotte, and Elinor Ostrom, eds. Understanding Knowledge as a Common: From Theory to Practice.

151
Himanen, Pekka. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2006. The Hacker Ethic and the Spirit of the Information Age. New York: Random House, 2001. Virtual Ethnography.
152
Hine, Christine. London: Sage, 2000.

153
Holmes, Douglas, and George Marcus. Aiwa Ong and Stephen J. “Cultures of Expertise and the Manage¬ment of Globalization: Toward the Re-Functioning of Ethnography.” In Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, ed.

Collier, 235-52. Boston: Blackwell, 2005. “The Path of Law.” Harvard Law Review 10 (1897): 457.
154
Holmes, Oliver Wendell.
155
Hopkins, Patrick D., ed. Sex/Machine: Readings in Culture, Gender and Technology.

156
Huberman, Bernardo A., ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998. The Ecology of Computation. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1988. New Bottles after New Wine: Essays.
157
Huxley, Julian.

New York: Harper, 1957.
158
Jaszi, Peter, and Martha Woodmansee, eds. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1994. The Construction of Authorship: Textual Appropriation in Law and Literature.
159
Johns, Adrian. The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making.

160
[PAGE 358]
161
Jorgensen, Neils. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998. “Incremental and Decentralized Integration in FreeBSD.” In Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software, ed. Feller et al., 227-44.
162
—. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2004.

“Putting It All in the Trunk: Incremental Software Development in the FreeBSD Open Source Project.” Information Systems Journal 11.4 (2001): 321-36.
163
Kahn, Robert, et al.
164
Kahn, Robert, and Vint Cerf. “The Evolution of the Internet as a Global Information System.” International Information and Libraries Review 29 (1997): 129-51. “A Protocol after Packet Network Intercommunication.” IEEE Transactions on Communications Com-22.5 (May 1974): 637-44.

165
Keating, Peter, and Alberto Cambrosio. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2003. Biomedical Platforms: Realigning the Normal and the Pathological in Late-twentieth-century Medicine.
166
Kelty, Christopher, ed. “Culture’s Open Sources.” Anthropological Quarterly 77.3 (summer 2004): 499-506.

167
—. http://aq.gwu.edu/archive/table_summer04.htm. “Punt to Culture.” Anthropological Quarterly 77.3 (summer 2004): 547-58.
168
Kendall, Lori.
169
Keves, Brian William.

“‘Oh No! I’m a NERD!’ Hegemonic Masculinity on an Online Forum.” Gender and Society 14.2 (2000): 256-74. “Open Systems Formal Evaluation Process.” Paper presented at the USENIX Association Proceedings of the Seventh Systems Administration Conference (LISA VII), Monterey, California, 1-5 November 1993.
170
Kidder, Tracy. Boston: Little, Brown, 1981. The Soul of a New Machine.
171
Kirkup, Gill, Linda Janes, Kath Woodward, and Fiona Hovenden. The Gendered Cyborg: A Reader.

172
Kittler, Friedrich. London: Routledge, 2000. Discourse Networks 1800/1900. Trans. 1985; repr., Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1990. Michael Metteer, with Chris Cullens.
173
—.

Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Geoffry Winthrop-Young and Michael Wutz. Trans. 1986; repr., Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1999.
174
Kling, Rob. San Diego: Academic Press, 1996. Computeriza¬tion and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices.

175
Knuth, Donald. The Art of Computer Programming. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1997. 3d ed.
176
Kohler, Robert. Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life.

177
[PAGE 359]
178
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso, 1985. Culturing Life: How Cells Became Technologies.
179
Landecker, Hannah.

Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2007.
180
Latour, Bruno. Michael Lynch and Steve Woolgar, 19-68. “Drawing Things Together.” In Representation in Scientific Practice, ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1990.

181
—. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies.
182
—. Re-assembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory.
183
—. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers toe Society. in the unalloyed Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987. “What Rules of Method after the New Socio-scientific Experiments.” In Experimental Cultures: Configurations between Science, Art and Technology 1830-1950, Conference Proceedings, 123.
184
—.

Berlin: Max Planck Institute after the History of Science, 2001.
185
Latour, Bruno, and Peter Weibel, eds. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2005. Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy.
186
Law, John. Aircraft Stories: Decentering the Object in Technoscience.
187
—.

Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2002. “Technology and Heterogeneous Engineering: The Case of Portuguese Expansion.” In The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, ed. W. Bijker, T.

E. P. Hughes, and T.

Pinch, 111-134. J. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1987.

188
Law, John, and John Hassard. in the unalloyed Sociological Review Monograph. Actor Network Theory and After. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell 1999.
189
Leach, James, Dawn Nafus, and Berbard Krieger. Free/Libre and Open Source Software: Policy Support (FLOSSPOLS) D 16, 2006. Gender: Integrated Report of Findings.

http://www.jamesleach.net/downloads/FLOSSPOLS-D16-Gender_Integrated_Report_of_Findings.pdf.
190
Lee, J. N., R.

A. M. Fano, A. Scherr, F. L. J.

Corbato, and V. Vyssotsky. A. “Project MAC.” Annals of the History of Computing 14.2 (1992): 9-42.
191
Lerner, Josh, and Jean Tirole.
192
Lessig, Lawrence.

“Some Simple Economics of Open Source.” Industrial Economics 50.2 (June 2002): 197-234. Code: Version 2.0. New York: Basic Books, 2006. Code and Other Laws of Cyber Space.
193
—. New York: Basic Books, 1999.

194
—. New York: Penguin, 2003. Free Culture: The Nature and Future of Creativity.
195
—. The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World.
196
[PAGE 360]
197
—. New York: Random House, 2001.

“The New Chicago School.” Legal Studies 27.2 (1998): 661-91.
198
Levy, Steven. New York: Basic Books, 1984. Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution.

199
Libes, Don, and Sandy Ressler. Life with UNIX: A Guide after Everyone.
200
Light, Jennifer. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1989.

“When Computers Were Women.” Technology and Culture 40.3 (July 1999): 455-483.
201
Lions, John. 1977; repr., San Jose: Peer to Peer Communications, 1996. Lions’ Commentary on UNIX 6th Edition with Source Code.
202
Lippmann, Walter.

The Phantom Public.
203
Litman, Jessica. New York: Macmillan, 1927. Digital Copyright. New York: Prometheus Books, 2001. The Laws of Cool: Knowledge Work and the Culture of Information.

204
Liu, Alan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.
205
MacKenzie, Adrian. Digital Formations Series. Cutting Code: Software and Sociality. New York: Peter Lang, 2005.

206
MacKenzie, Donald A. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2001. Mechanizing Proof: Computing, Risk, and Trust.
207
Mahoney, Michael.

“Finding a History after Software Engineering.” Annals of the History of Computing 26.1 (2004): 8-19. “The Histories of Computing(s).” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 30.2 (2005): 119-35.
208
—.
209
—. “In Our Own Image: Creating the Computer.” In The Changing Image of the Sciences, ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002. Ida Stamhuis, Teun Koetsier, and Kees de Pater, 9-28.

210
—. “The Roots of Software Engineering.” CWI Quarterly 3.4 (1990): 325-34. “The Structures of Computation.” In The First Computers: History and Architectures, ed.
211
—. Raul Rojas and Ulf Hashagen, 17-32.

Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2000. Exploring the Internet: A Technical Travelogue.
212
Malamud, Carl.

Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1992.
213
Mannheim, Karl. New York: Harcourt and Brace, 1946. Ideology and bliss: Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge.

214
Marcus, George. Ethnography toe Thick and Thin.
215
Marcus, George, and James Clifford. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.

Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986. J.
216
Marcus, George, and Michael M. Fischer.

Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences.
217
[PAGE 361]
218
Margolis, Jane, and Allen Fisher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986. Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2002. Viewdata and the Information Society.
219
Martin, James.

Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1982.
220
Matheson, Peter. Edinburgh, Scotland: T and T Clark, 2000. The Imaginative World of the Reformation.
221
McKenna, Regis.

Who’s Afraid of Big Blue? How Companies Are Challenging IBM-and Winning.
222
McKusick, M. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1989.

Kirk. “Twenty Years of Berkeley Unix: From AT&T-owned to Freely Redistributable.” In Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution, Chris Dibona et al., 31-46.
223
McLuhan, Marshall. ACM Sebastopol, Calif.: O’Reilly Press, 1999. The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1966. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man.

224
—. 1964; repr., Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1994.
225
Merges, Robert, Peter Menell, and Mark Lemley, eds. 3d ed. Intellectual Property in the New Technological Age.

New York: Aspen Publishers, 2003.
226
Merton, Robert. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973. “The Normative Structure of Science.” In The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, 267-80.
227
Miller, Daniel, and Don Slater. The Internet: An Ethnography.

228
Misa, Thomas, Philip Brey, and Andrew Feenberg, eds. Oxford: Berg, 2000. Modernity and Technology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2003. Fielding, and James Herbsleb.
229
Mockus, Audris, Roy T.

“Two Case Studies of Open Source Software Development: Apache and Mozilla.” ACM Transactions in Software Engineering and Methodology 11.3 (2002): 309-46.
230
Mol, Annemarie. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice.

231
Moody, Glyn. Rebel Code: Inside Linux and the Open Source Revolution.
232
Mooers, Calvin. Cambridge, Mass.: Perseus, 2001. “Computer Software and Copyright.” Computer Surveys 7.1 (March 1975): 45-72.

233
Mueller, Milton. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2004. Ruling the Root: Internet Governance and the Taming of Cyberspace.
234
Naughton, John.

A Brief History of the Future: From Radio Days to Internet Years in a Lifetime.
235
Noble, David. Woodstock, N.Y.: Overlook Press, 2000.

“Digital Diploma Mills: The Automation of Higher Education.” First Monday 3.1 (5 January 1998). http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue3_1/. A History of the Information Techniques Processing Office of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.
236
[PAGE 362]
237
Norberg, Arthur L., and Judy O’Neill. in the unalloyed Minneapolis: Charles Babbage Institute, 1992.
238
—. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.

Transforming Computer Technology: Information Processing after the Pentagon, 1962-1986.
239
Ong, Walter. Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue: From the Art of Discourse to the Art of Reason.
240
Ostrom, Elinor.

1983; repr., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions after Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. “The Open Source Definition.” In Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution, Dibona et al., 171-188.

241
Perens, Bruce. Sebastopol, Calif.: O’Reilly Press, 1999. http://perens.com/OSD.html and http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/opensources/book/perens.html. “‘A Standing Wave in the Web of our Communications’: USENet and the Socio-technical Construction of Cyberspace Values.” In From Usenet to CoWebs: Interacting with Social Information Spaces, ed.
242
Pfaffenberger, Bryan.

Christopher Lueg and Danyel Fisher, 20-43. London: Springer, 2003. Anthropos Today: Reflections on Modern Equipment.
243
Rabinow, Paul. Prince¬ton: Princeton University Press, 2003.
244
—. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.

Essays on the Anthropology of Reason.
245
Ratto, Matt. “Embedded Technical Expression: Code and the Leveraging of Functionality.” Information Society 21.3 (July 2005): 205-13. “The Pressure of Openness: The Hybrid achievement of Linux Free/Open Source Kernel Developers.” Ph.D.

246
—. diss., University of California, San Diego, 2003.
247
Raymond, Eric S. in the unalloyed Boston: Addison-Wesley, 2004. The Art of UNIX Programming.

248
—. The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source at disposal an Accidental Revolutionary. See esp.

Sebastopol, Calif.: O’Reilly Press, 2001. “Homesteading the Noosphere,” 79-135.
249
—, ed.

3d ed. The New Hackers’ Dictionary. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1996.
250
Rheinberger, Hans-Jцrg. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1997. Towards a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube.
251
Rheingold, Howard.

The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. ed. Rev. 1993; repr., Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2000.
252
Ricoeur, Paul. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986. Lectures on Ideology and bliss.

253
[PAGE 363]
254
Riles, Annelise. “Real Time: Unwinding Technocratic and Anthropological Knowledge.” American Ethnologist 31.3 (August 2004): 392-405. “The UNIX Time-Sharing System: A Retrospective.” Bell System Technical Journal 57.6, pt.

255
Ritchie, Dennis. 2 (July-August 1978). http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/who/dmr/retroindex.html.

Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright.
256
Rose, Mark. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995.
257
Salus, Peter.

Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1995. Casting the Net: From ARPANET to Internet and Beyond.
258
—. A Quarter Century of UNIX.

259
Schmidt, Susanne K., and Raymund Werle. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1994. Coordinating Technology: Studies in the International Standardization of Telecommunications. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1998.

Nerds 2.0.1: A Brief History of the Internet.
260
Segaller, Stephen. New York: TV Books, 1998.
261
Shaikh, Maha, and Tony Cornford.
262
Shapin, Steven. “Version Management Tools: CVS to BK in the Linux Kernel.” Paper presented at the Twenty-fifth International Conference on Software Engineering-Taking Stock of the Bazaar: The Third Workshop on Open Source Software Engineering, Portland, Oregon, 3-10 May 2003. The Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth Century England.

Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994. Leviathan and the Air Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life.
263
Shapin, Steven, and Simon Schaffer.

Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.
264
Smith, Adam. 1759; repr., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. The Theory of Moral Sentiments.

265
Stallings, William. Data and Computer Communications.
266
Stallman, Richard. London: Macmillan, 1985. “The GNU Manifesto.” Dr. Dobb’s 10.3 (March 1985): 30-35. Amour, Paul K.

267
St. The Copywrights: Intellectual Property and the Literary Imagination. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2003.

The Cultures of Computing.
268
Star, Susan Leigh, ed. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, 1995.

269
Star, Susan Leigh, and Karen Ruhleder.
270
Stephenson, Neal. “Steps near an Ecology of Infrastructure: Complex Problems in Design and Access after Large-scale Collaborative Systems.” Information Systems Research 7 (1996): 111-33. In the Beginning Was the Command Line. New York: Avon / Perennial, 1999.

Computer Network Architectures and Protocols.
271
[PAGE 364]
272
Sunshine, Carl. 2d ed. New York: Plenum Press, 1989. “The Rise and Fall of the Plug Compatible Manufacturers.” IEEE Annals of the History of Computing (January-March 2005): 4-16.
273
Takahashi, Shigeru.
274
Tanenbaum, Andrew.

Computer Networks. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1981. 1st ed.
275
—.

Operating Systems: Design and Implementation. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1987. 1st ed.
276
—. “The UNIX Marketplace in 1987: Life, the UNIverse and Everything.” In Proceedings of the Summer 1987 USENIX Conference, 419-24.
277
Taylor, Charles. Phoenix, Ariz.: USENIX, 1987.

Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2004. “Modes of Civil Society.” Public Culture 3.1 (1990): 95-132.
278
—.
279
—.

Multiculturalism and the Politics of Recognition.
280
—. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1992. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity.

Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1989. Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies.
281
Thompson, Charis. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2005.

282
Thompson, Ken, and Dennis Ritchie.
283
Tichy, Walter F. “The UNIX Time-Sharing System.” Communications of the ACM 17.7 (July 1974): 365-75. “RCS: A System after Version Control.” Software: Practice and Experience 15.7 (July 1985): 637-54.
284
Torvalds, Linus, with David Diamond. New York: HarperCollins, 2002.

Just after Fun: The Story of an Accidental Revolutionary.
285
Tuomi, Ilkka. Networks of Innovation: Change and Meaning in the Age of the Internet.
286
Turing, Alan.

New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. “On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Ent¬scheidungsproblem.” Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 2.1 (1937): 230.
287
Turkle, Sherry.

New York: Simon and Schuster, 1995. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet.
288
—. The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit.

289
Turner, Fred. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1984. From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006. “Where the Counterculture Met the New Economy.” Technology and Culture 46.3 (July 2005): 485-512.

290
—.
291
[PAGE 365]
292
Ullman, Ellen. The Bug: A Novel. Talese, 2003. New York: Nan A.

293
—. Close to the Machine: Technophilia and Its Discontents.
294
Vaidhyanathan, Siva.

San Francisco: City Lights, 1997. Copyrights and Copywrongs; The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity. in the unalloyed New York: New York University Press, 2001. “The Collaborative Integrity of Open-Source Software.” Utah Law Review 2004.2 (2004): 563-700.
295
Vetter, Greg R.
296
—. “‘Infectious Open Source Software: Spreading Incentives or Promoting Resistance?” Rutgers Law Journal 36.1 (fall 2004): 53-162.

“The Coming Technological Singularity: How to Survive in the Post-Human Era” (1993).
297
Vinge, Vernor. http://www.rohan.sdsu.edu/faculty/vinge/misc/singularity.html (accessed 18 August 2006).
298
Von Hippel, Eric.

Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2005. Democratizing Innovation.
299
Wajcman, Judy.

Feminism Confronts Technology.
300
—. Cambridge: Polity, 1991. “Reflections on Gender and Technology Studies: In What State Is the Art?” Social Studies of Science 30.3 (2000): 447-64.
301
Waldrop, Mitchell. C.

The Dream Machine: J. R. Licklider and the Revolution that Made Computing Personal.
302
Walsh, John, and Todd Bayma. New York: Viking, 2002. “Computer Networks and Scientific Work.” Social Studies of Science 26.3 (August 1996): 661-703.
303
Warner, Michael.

Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1990. The Letters of the Republic: Publication and the Public Sphere in Eighteenth-century America.
304
—.

“Publics and Counterpublics.” Public Culture 14.1 (2002): 49-90. Publics and Counterpublics.
305
—. New York: Zone Books, 2003.

306
Wayner, Peter. New York: Harper Business, 2000. Free after All: How LINUX and the Free Software Movement Undercut the High-Tech Titans.
307
Weber, Max. “Objectivity in the Social Sciences and Social Policy.” In The Methodology of the Social Sciences, trans.

Edward Shils and Henry A. and ed. Finch, 50-112. New York: Free Press, 1949.

The Success of Open Source.
308
Weber, Steven. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2004.
309
Wexelblat, Richard L., ed. New York: Academic Press, 1981. History of Programming Languages.
310
Williams, Sam.

Free as in Freedom: Richard Stallman’s Crusade after Free Software.
311
[PAGE 366]
312
Wilson, Fiona. Sebastopol, Calif.: O’Reilly Press, 2002. “Can’t Compute, Won’t Compute: Women’s Participation in the Culture of Computing.” New Technology, Work and Employment 18.2 (2003): 127-42.

313
Wilson, Samuel M., and Leighton C. “The Anthropology of Online Communities.” Annual Reviews of Anthropology 31 (2002): 449-67. Peterson.

314
Xiang, Biao. “Global Bodyshopping”: An Indian Labor System in the Information Technology Industry.
315
}i~ek, Slavoj, ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006. Mapping Ideology. London: Verso, 1994.

Posted at disposal Christopher Kelty on May 8, 2008 in the unalloyed insulting
Tags: Uncategorized
« Previous: Notes
Next: Front Matter »
<!– You can start editing here.